Socratic Argument In the Apology, Socrates is being placed on trial by three of his rivals for different activities that he is accused of being involved in. The most notable include: corrupting the youth of Athens and not supporting the same religious beliefs as everyone else. During the trial, his enemies are utilizing these charges to demonstrate how he knowingly engaged in these actions. They are demanding that he apologize for the crimes that he committed and begin to conform to the most common practices in contemporary society. (Plato, 2000) ("The Apology," 2012) ("Analysis of the Apology," 2010)

However, Socrates uses this as a forum to ridicule these individuals, question the legitimacy of the trial and to defend himself. This is problematic, as these cavalier attitudes will eventually lead to him being found guilty and sentenced to death. To fully understand what is taking place requires carefully examining his key arguments and how they influenced the jury. Together, these elements will highlight the way he presented his case and the lasting impact. (Plato, 2000) ("The Apology," 2012) ("Analysis of the Apology," 2010)

Main Arguments in the Apology

In the Apology, Socrates tells the jury how their minds have been influenced by his enemies. They are focused on destroying him at all costs and are jealous of his success. This is because he is more intellectual and sophisticated than they are. These individuals cannot stand the fact that he is wiser than them and wants to discredit him at any cost. (Plato, 2000) ("The Apology," 2012) ("Analysis of the Apology," 2010)

Evidence of this can be seen with Socrates saying, "There have been many who have accused me...

These earlier ones, however, are more so gentleman; they got a hold of your from childhood, persuaded you and accused me quite falsely. They are saying that there is a man named Socrates. He is a wise man, a student of all things in the sky and below the Earth who make the worst arguments stronger." This is illustrating how Socrates believes that he is being framed by his enemies. These arguments are based upon the fact that he is questioning their views of the world and how they see everyone around them. (Plato, 2000) ("The Apology," 2012) ("Analysis of the Apology," 2010)
Next, Socrates claims that he is on a divine mission. This is occurring from his ability to question the ideas of the gods and provide more clarity about the insights of the oracle. According to him, an ignorant man could be misunderstood and is in fact wise. This is because there are many theologians, scholars and poets who are well respects in contemporary society. However, when someone is examining their different works, they will often seem ambiguous and confusing. Only after careful reflection and analysis can everyone gain a greater understanding of these concepts. (Plato, 2000) ("The Apology," 2012) ("Analysis of the Apology," 2010)

As a result, Socrates argues that questioning everything has helped him to have a different perspective of the world around him. When this happens, he is able to provide more insights about the underlying meaning of various social norms and customs. It is at this point that he claims ignorant minds are trying to negatively influence his beliefs (which are leading to the trial and false charges against him). (Plato, 2000) ("The Apology," 2012) ("Analysis of the Apology," 2010)

This is significant in showing how he is supporting the ideas of the deities and traditional theological norms. However, what makes him different is that Socrates is willing to question the interpretations of them and look for more empowering answers. It is from these actions that his enemies are using this. In order, to demonstrate that he is an annoying busy body, who…